Archive for the ‘Addiction Philosophy’ Category

Freedom & Responsibility (and addiction)

Friday, December 11th, 2009

The experiences of freedom and responsibility are very closely tied to addiction, but are so much more in the forefront of a human being’s struggle that addiction is quite secondary and symptomatic.  It is not the major issue.  Many clients are in addiction because it is the ultimate place to hide from freedom and responsibility.  “That’s crazy,” you say!  Yes and No.  We all do a lot to run from freedom and responsibility.  “No, not me!” As human beings we live within many paradoxes, and one major paradox we deal with on a daily basis is confronting our freedom and responsibility.  We both crave it and run from it.  People will die for it (terrorism, martyrdom, etc.) and die to avoid it (addiction).

I will let someone else explain this better than I and then discuss.  Yang (2009) writes:

According to Fromm, freedom is unavoidably tied to responsibility and destiny. Responsibility is equated with authorship.  Jean-Paul Sartre (1956) wrote that to be responsible is to be “the uncontested author of an event or thing” (p. 633). To be aware of responsibility is to be aware of creating one’s own self, destiny, life predicament, feelings, and, if such be the case, one’s own suffering. Sartre, like Fromm, believes that human beings are doomed to freedom.  Again, a paradox. (p. 184).

How can discussing freedom sound so negative and depressing??!!  No one ever said the existentialists were a bubbly sort and their writings definitely struggle with the sunnier side of life, but they do write about human realities. We are in a paradox.  We do fear our own freedom.  We do fear our own sense of responsibility.  It can feel like walking a plank.  It can make us want to run Home or stay in bed.

Addiction is also a paradox.  It can serve both as a way to avoid, as well as, a way to discover.  It can be a way one’s psyche forces them to take responsibility.  The only way out of addiction is to take responsibility and confront one’s freedom.  I have seen adolescents and people in their twenties arrive in addiction because so much was done for them by parents that they don’t know how to stand on their own two feet.  Addiction is a way to cope with that but it is also a way to change the dynamics in the relationship so drastically that parents can no longer “rescue” their “child” and that child is forced, by their own accord, to grow up, take responsibility, and live life.  This becomes a choice for the person in addiction.  Do they want freedom?  Without choice and responsibility, we have no freedom.

As the quote stated above, the scariest thing about responsibility and freedom is that it is ultimately up to us to create our life, “to be the uncontested author” of our lives.  We create our predicament.  “No, not me, the government screwed me, my parents have wronged me, my boss is unfair, my family won’t talk to me, I have a disability, I’m clinically depressed!!!”  We all have limitations, and some more than others, but the only true way out of them is to realize what responsibility we do have for our feelings, our thoughts, and our lives.  There are also limits to freedom, and accepting and realizing this will help to “experience” freedom within those limits.

But why is it so scary to be the author of our lives?  That’s what we want isn’t it???  Yes and no.  If it is all up to us, then we are very much to blame.  We don’t’ want to hear that.  We don’t want to feel like failures in a world that expects perfection the first time.  We want a place to lay blame if it doesn’t work out.  “I’m not clean because that treatment center sucks!”  “I cheated on my wife because she won’t have sex with me.”  “You made me angry.”  “I can’t go after my dreams because my mother needs me to take care of her.”  Even the things we think are to blame are choices we make.  We already are the author’s of our lives but we can often ignore that.

Accepting responsibility for everything, gives us freedom.  Realizing we make choices everyday, and accept responsibility for those choices, gives us freedom.  Freedom is scary, but once we step into it, it is liberating.  We are all looking for some aspect of liberation, but ultimately we are needing full liberation from ourselves – that part of ourselves that gets in the way of freedom: our fear.

Hoffman, L., Yang, M., Kaklauskas, F., & Chan, A. (2009). Existential Psychology East-West. University of the Rockies Press: Colorado.

Written by Jason McCarty, Outpatient Therapist

Addiction as Useful | Necessary

Wednesday, November 18th, 2009

One way to look at addiction is that it serves a purpose.  Finding meaning in one’s addiction can help put the craziness into perspective.  For many clients, addiction leads them to the healing of deeper issues they might never have explored.  Addiction seems to work at getting one’s attention.  It also seems to work at forcing one to dirty themselves in such a way that pushes them to eventually take more responsibility for their lives (even though it may look as though all they want to do is push responsibility away).  People become addicted for a combination of a number of reasons.  Even if it seems as simple as pure habit and biological sensitivity, human beings always have choice.  For many it’s the best way to live with great amounts of pain, both emotional and physical. It takes time and mindful exploration to understand the “purpose” of one’s addiction – but it is there, somewhere within the soul.  Addiction can be seen as the soul’s cry.

Written by Jason McCarty, Outpatient therapist

Addiction, Needs, and Compassion

Thursday, October 29th, 2009

For many people – those working in the addiction field, or those experiencing an addict in their lives – it can feel frustrating that the addict keeps using.  We might feel they are being selfish, lazy, and irresponsible. We ask ourselves, “who would put up with not showering, living on the streets, stealing, selling themselves for sex, injecting their heroin with dirty puddle water, and on and on?”  “Those people are disgusting!”  “I can’t stand addicts!”  “I hate working with addicts, they’re always trying to get something from me!”  These are just some of the lines running through our heads at times.  The last thought is “why don’t they stop?”  The million dollar question.  Some answer through a biological explanation, others an adaptive explanation, others a spiritual explanation, and some a social learning explanation.  It is all of these.  But for this essay I want to focus on a more adaptive explanation and one that is more concerned with an ongoing internal process in the here and now, one that concerns itself with the meeting of human needs.

It’s obviously hard to have compassion for those abusing substances.  But, really, that is the easy reaction to have.  Staying there only keeps one in the dark about the addict and about themselves.  Dr. Wayland Myers, PhD, has written a document about “Defining a Nonviolent Communication Approach (NVC) to Addictive Behaviors.” In this he explains how Marshall Rosenberg, the founder of NVC, tries to approach the addict by using empathy and trying to understand what needs are being met by using.  He does not try and get addicts to stop using.  Substance abusers are usually quite perplexed by his approach because they are used to everyone trying to get them to stop.  His focus is on needs so that he can proceed in helping that person meet those needs in ways that are “more effective and less costly.”  This is not easy for many people in our society as we want to FIX people.  It is tough to give up coercive measures, confrontational approaches, and parental directives.  As helpers or loved ones we can often feel helpless, out of control, and frustrated within the paradigm of judgment and control because it becomes a negative feedback loop. Pushing our goals onto someone else may work in the short term, but usually, though, backfires, and can often perpetuate disconnection, a need all humans value.

So why do we continue to stay in this place where we NEED substance abusers to stop? Why do we work so hard FOR SOMEONE ELSE?  Why do we feel so out of control? Why do we get frustrated, angry and hurt by their use?  It is usually more to do with our own needs not being met.  As helpers, we must connect with our own needs in order to connect with another’s.  It is also a paradigm that we are in that using is wrong and we must “intervene”, we must “challenge” them, we must, we must, we must.  “They don’t know how to live life”, “they are irresponsible”, “they have mental health issues”, “they have a brain injury”, “they are still a child”, “they experienced trauma” – ultimately we are invading their sense of humanity, their internal world, their “creative adjustment” as described in Gestalt psychology. Using, for many, has been a very creative way to cope, adjust, and stay alive.  It has become an organismic adaptation to life experiences. Why do we want to pull this carpet out from under them so quickly and harshly??

Instead of making all these assumptions and judgments, we need to “connect” with addicts as in NVC, or make “contact” as in Gestalt psychology. Take away the stories, take away the judgments, and learn what is there.  What need is being met by all this using.  Can we help this person make contact with their own internal world so that they can at least value their own world?  Shame is the result of continuously denying one’s own experience.  We can blast away shame by listening, connecting, and helping those who use to become more in tune with their needs and their internal worlds.  We must remove our judgments and need for control so that we can offer humanity to someone.

From an existential point of view, it is that person’s responsibility to take control of their life how they see fit.  From a person-centered and gestalt psychology point of view, all human beings are moving toward growth in some way.  We can either help them get there taking which ever roads fit best for them, or we can weigh them down on the road of addiction. The more we focus on getting them to stop the addiction, the longer they only focus there and stay on that path.  The quicker we begin walking with them on that path instead of hurrying them off, the quicker they will want to explore other options.  Once someone feels truly supported and understood they will feel the energy to take on new experiences.

So, what are their needs? How can you help them connect to their needs?  If you are addicted, how are you not connecting to your self?

Lastly, I want to make a quick point here about boundaries.  Nowhere in this approach or understanding does it say let substance abusers or anyone for that matter treat you however they feel like it.  You do not have to just sit there and accept all behavior toward you to be compassionate.  It is important for all humans to connect to their own needs and express these honestly.  So if you are feeling manipulated, hurt, taken advantage of, etc, then calmly express this to the person so they understand.  We must meet our needs as helpers as well and do not need to allow dysfunctional ways of relating to hurt us for the sake of “compassion.”  This is not how it works.  The compassion and connecting are to the person and the unmet needs, not to allowing yourself to be treated in ways you don’t want.

Post written by: Jason McCarty, Outpatient Therapist